The viewfinder provides the same magnification and eyepoint as the D810’s but it lacks an eyepiece shutter and the eyepiece itself is rectangular, indicating it’s consumer-orientated. Users can adjust the colour rendition of the screen along A/B and G/M axes, much as they can tweak white balance settings. Two fingernail cut-outs make it easy to pull the screen out from the camera body, after which it can be tilted up through a little over 90 degrees or down through slightly less than 90 degrees, even when the camera is tripod mounted. The tilting monitor provides a point of difference on the rear panel. Magnesium-alloy panels on the top and rear sections of the camera body complete a shell that is described as ‘weather resistant’.Īngled view of the D750’s rear panel, showing the tilting monitor. A one-piece casing of carbon-fibre composite wraps around the front and side panels and covers most of the base plate. Nikon describes the D750’s body as a having ‘monocoque’ structure in which its strength is a result of a curved design (much like an eggshell). Metal top & rear panels, plastic elsewhereĪuto, Flash off, P, A, S, M, Scene, Effects, U1, U2ġ080p at 30/25/24 fps 720p at 60/50/30/25 fps The table below can assist you to evaluate the main differences between the four cameras. Photo enthusiasts contemplating Nikon’s FX line-up will probably find it quite difficult to decide which model will actually meet their requirements for the money they are prepared to invest. Aside from the ‘retro’ styled Df model, the practical differences between the D750, D610 and D810 are relatively slight. If you eliminate the D4s, separating the rest is not quite that simple. The release of the D750 splits the Nikon’s FX (‘full frame’) offerings into three categories, with two models pitched at upgrading hobbyists, two at serious enthusiasts and the D4s a purely professional camera. So the samples posted represent crops from images that were roughly four times the size. Our normal tests of flash exposure accuracy and the adjustability of the flash exposure system were impossible because we couldn’t allow adequate distance between the camera and the subject. We struggled to adapt our reviewing system to enable this lens to be used but there are some tests we simply couldn’t manage. It’s a nice enough lens and a competent performer but quite unsuitable for use for a technical review because it severely restricts the types of subjects that can be photographed, particularly so for shooting movies. Unfortunately, the only lens that could be provided was the AF-S Nikkor 24mm f/1.4G ED lens, which we reviewed in March 2010. Photo Review was offered one of the first review units to be released in Australia for this review. The EXPEED 4 processor also rates highly in promotional material, along with the new camera’s speed, versatility and agility. The lightweight, rugged body and built-in Wi-Fi are among the advantages Nikon is promoting for its latest camera. The Nikon D750, pictured with the AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR lens.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |